Hesam Iranmanesh; Elahe Arab Ameri; Ahmad Farrokhi; Hamideh Iranmanesh
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three types of balancetraining: single task, dual task under fixed priority instructional set (Fp) and dualtask under a variable priority instructional set (Vp) on the balance of the elderly.The participants were 36 elderly over 65 years old from Kerman ...
Read More
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three types of balancetraining: single task, dual task under fixed priority instructional set (Fp) and dualtask under a variable priority instructional set (Vp) on the balance of the elderly.The participants were 36 elderly over 65 years old from Kerman province whowere randomly divided into three groups (each 12 subjects) based on Burg pretestscores. The groups included single task, dual task under fixed priority and dualtask under variable priority. Experimental groups received 45 minutes of trainingsession, 3 sessions a week for 4 weeks. For data analysis, ANCOVA andBonferroni post hoc test were used at (P≤0.05). The results showed that asignificant difference between single task and dual task under fixed priority groupsand also between single task and dual task under variable priority (P=0.008 andP=0.000 respectively). There was no significant difference between dual task underfixed priority and variable priority groups (P=0.149). In addition, the results inTug test under dual task condition showed a significant difference between singletask and dual task under fixed priority groups and also between single task anddual task under variable priority groups and also between dual task under fixedand variable priority groups (P=0.035, P=0.033, P=0.000 respectively). Theresults showed that single and dual task balance training improved balanceperformance in the elderly but those who had training under dual taskoutperformed under single and dual task conditions.
Hamideh Iranmanesh; Hesam Iranmanesh; Alireza Saberi Kakhaki; Reza Iranmanesh
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship of the perception of the peer motivational climate, stress and the weekly training with burnout in junior elite athletes of Kerman province. The statistical population consisted of 120 male elite athletes from Kerman province from individual ...
Read More
The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship of the perception of the peer motivational climate, stress and the weekly training with burnout in junior elite athletes of Kerman province. The statistical population consisted of 120 male elite athletes from Kerman province from individual and team sports (table tennis, karate, taekwondo, badminton, cycling, handball, volleyball, basketball, football) who continuously trained at Kerman championship gym in 1391 with the age range of 15–19 years and at least 4 years of experience of participating in a sport field with medals in Iran championships. 92 athletes were randomly selected using Cochran formula. To collect data, peer motivational climate questionnaire (Ntoumanis and Vazou, 2005), athletes' burnout questionnaire (Raedeke and Smith, 2001) and perceived stress scale (Cohen et al., 1983) were used. Finally, personal demographic forms were used to determine the weekly training hours, acquired positions, the duration of activity, age and sport field. To analyze the data, Pearson correlation coefficient, multivariate regression, scatter plot and independent t test were used. The results showed a negative and significant relationship between all peer motivational climate components (except for intra-team conflict) and all burnout components (P<0.05). There was a positive relationship between intra-team conflict and burnout but this relationship was not significant (P≥0.05). There was a positive and significant relationship between perceived stress and all burnout components (P<0.05). There was no significant relationship between weekly training hours and burnout and its components (P≥0.05). Also, there was no significant difference in burnout, perception of peer motivational climate, stress and weekly training hours between individual and team sports (P≥0.05). Finally, the statistical results for prediction of burnout showed that 47.7% of burnout could be explained by the perception of peer motivational climate, stress and weekly training. In addition, stress was the dominant predictor of burnout. The results showed that paying attention to the role of peers and controlling stress during burnout process can guarantee to decrease this phenomenon in junior elite athletes and can improve their performance and stability in sport.
