Roza Rahavi; Masoumeh Shojaei; Zahra Estiri; Hasan Naghizadeh
Abstract
Contextual interference is one of the instructional methods for several skills.The aim of this research was to determine the effects of interference beforeperformance and interference during performance on the acquisition and retentionof generalized motor program and parameter in basketball skills with ...
Read More
Contextual interference is one of the instructional methods for several skills.The aim of this research was to determine the effects of interference beforeperformance and interference during performance on the acquisition and retentionof generalized motor program and parameter in basketball skills with an emphasison the examination of contextual interference hypotheses and self-regulationlearning theories. In interference before performance, self-practice schedules isgenerated (self-regulation effect) and interference during performance,experimenter-imposed practice schedule is generated (contextual interferenceeffect). For this purpose, 120 students of Yazd University (age range 19-21 yearsold) who had no prior experience in basketball skills volunteered to participate inthis study. Participants were randomly assigned to 10 groups (each 12 subjects); 5groups practiced with generalized motor program (dribble, chest pass and freethrow skills) and 5 groups practiced with parameter (free throw from differentdistances) in practice schedules (blocked, random, serial, self-regulated and yokedto self-regulated). To collect data, throw and pass test (AAHPERD basketball test)and dribble test (Johnson basketball test) were used. After the pretest, in theacquisition phase, subjects took part in 5 training sessions including 45 trails persession (15 trails each block) for 5 days. After 48 hours, they participated inretention test with 15 trails (5 trials each task). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, factor analysis of variance with repeated measures, LSD and Duncanpost hoc tests. Results showed a significant difference among practice schedules inacquisition and retention phases of generalized motor program, that is, the effect ofcontextual interference was observed in this program (p<0.05). Also, there was asignificant difference among the schedules in acquisition and retention phases ofparameter, that is, controlling the design of practice has a positive effect onlearning (p<0.05). Thus, the results suggested that during learning process, theeffect of interference before performance was more important than duringperformance.
Alireza Farsi; Behrooz Abdoli; Mohammadreza Gasemian
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of random and blocked practices with respect to the changes in generalized motor program (GMP) and parameter on acquisition, retention and transfer of table tennis service. For this purpose, 32 subjects were randomly assigned to four groups (8 ...
Read More
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of random and blocked practices with respect to the changes in generalized motor program (GMP) and parameter on acquisition, retention and transfer of table tennis service. For this purpose, 32 subjects were randomly assigned to four groups (8 subjects each group). In the first two groups, GMP changed with blocked and random arrangements while in the last two groups, parameter changed with those arrangements. After pretest, participants completed 300 trials in each task (totally 900 trials) and then they participated in posttest, retention and two transfer tests with different aims. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and ANOVA with repeated measures (P˂0.05) and Bonferroni post hoc test was used to mark the differences of the groups. The findings showed that despite the type of changes, the random practice caused better performance than blocked practice and these advantages of random practice in GMP changes were greater. However, these effects not only were observed in the same situation but also were maintained in other contexts. In addition, these effects not only influenced performance but also caused the participants to perform the tasks with more efficiency, more cognitive effort and less attention.
Alireza Saberi; Hosien Samadi; Alireza Farsi; Korosh Ghahraman; Hamid Sedaghat
Volume 2, Issue 1 , April 2010, , Pages 91-114
Abstract
This research was performed to monitor the effects of different practice schedules on learning and transfer of generalized motor program and timing parameter in a serial task. For this purpose, 80 participants (age: 19-23 years) voluntarily participated in this research and then they were divided randomly ...
Read More
This research was performed to monitor the effects of different practice schedules on learning and transfer of generalized motor program and timing parameter in a serial task. For this purpose, 80 participants (age: 19-23 years) voluntarily participated in this research and then they were divided randomly into 4 groups: blocked, random, blocked-random and random-blocked. This test included performance of serial tasks with different generalized motor programs (spatial dimension variance) and variable timing parameter. The participants accomplished 108 trials (pretest) and participated in retention and transfer tests. After these tests, the amount of relative timing error (measure of consistency and proficiency of generalized motor program) and absolute timing error (measure of accuracy and proficiency of parameterization) was calculated. Analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test were used to analyze the data. The results showed a significant difference (P?0.05) among practice schedules in the acquisition phase, but in transfer and retention phases, despite the relative priority of combined practice groups, there was no significant difference among the groups.
