p. 271−292
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
p. 293−308
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
p. 309−325
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
p. 327−345
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
p. 347−363
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
p. 365−383
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
0.05) while imagery speed decrease in slow group was not significant when compared with their own physical performance in the pretest (P>0.05). Fast group accelerated their mental imagery in the training period (P<0.05). The comparison between pretest and post-test by paired t test revealed that karate athletes improved the time of their performance after the real time and fast imagery (P<0.05). However, slow imagery had no effect on post-test performance (P>0.05). Also, independent t test results showed no significant difference between the effect of real time and the fast imagery (P>0.05). It seems that mental imagery in real speed of action and fast imagery had the advantage to improve the performance duration compared with the slower imagery. In conclusion, mental image speed is an important factor in motor imagery and it is suggested that it should be controlled by the athletes.]]>
p. 385−396
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
p. 397−414
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3
p. 1−8
2676-4547
Vol.6/No.3