<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sports and Motor Development and  Learning</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9333</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effect of Errorless, Errorful and Random Practices on Learning of the Relative Timing of a Selected Motor Task: An Emphasis on Implicit and Explicit Learning Approaches</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Effect of Errorless, Errorful and Random Practices on Learning of the Relative Timing of a Selected Motor Task: An Emphasis on Implicit and Explicit Learning Approaches</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>321</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>342</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">74328</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jmlm.2019.254917.1366</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saeed</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nazari Kakavandi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD Student of Motor Learning, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saberi Kakhki</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamidreza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taheri Torbati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rohbanfard</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Bu-Ali Sina , Hamedan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the errorless, errorful and random practice schedules on the acquisition and learning of relative timing in a motor task. 51 male students (age: 22±4 years old) were selected and randomly assigned to four groups (control, errorful, errorless, and random). This study was carried out in five phases: pretest (PRT), acquisition (ACQ), 10-min retention and transfer and 24-hour retention and transfer. In the acquisition phase, a timing task with three different difficulty levels (simple, moderate, and difficult) was practiced in three sessions of 45 trials with feedback by experimental groups. In order to analyze the data, a mixed-design analysis of variance model with repeated measures on each variable was used in the acquisition and retention phases. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used in the other phases. The findings of relative timing showed no significant differences among the groups in the pretest (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;˃0.05). Additionally, in retention and transfer tests, errorless group had better performance than errorful, random and control groups (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;≤0.05). Errorless group performed better than the random and errorful groups in 24-hour transfer test of the secondary task (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;≤0.05). These results showed that practice in errorless conditions leads to a better learning of the task and its generalization to new conditions that are consistent with the implicit learning and reinvestment theories</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the errorless, errorful and random practice schedules on the acquisition and learning of relative timing in a motor task. 51 male students (age: 22±4 years old) were selected and randomly assigned to four groups (control, errorful, errorless, and random). This study was carried out in five phases: pretest (PRT), acquisition (ACQ), 10-min retention and transfer and 24-hour retention and transfer. In the acquisition phase, a timing task with three different difficulty levels (simple, moderate, and difficult) was practiced in three sessions of 45 trials with feedback by experimental groups. In order to analyze the data, a mixed-design analysis of variance model with repeated measures on each variable was used in the acquisition and retention phases. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used in the other phases. The findings of relative timing showed no significant differences among the groups in the pretest (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;˃0.05). Additionally, in retention and transfer tests, errorless group had better performance than errorful, random and control groups (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;≤0.05). Errorless group performed better than the random and errorful groups in 24-hour transfer test of the secondary task (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt;≤0.05). These results showed that practice in errorless conditions leads to a better learning of the task and its generalization to new conditions that are consistent with the implicit learning and reinvestment theories</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Errorless and errorful practice</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">implicit and explicit learning</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">random practice</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">relative timing</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsmdl.ut.ac.ir/article_74328_db05bf86219fe5d849732bd79f95dd45.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
