Document Type : Research Paper I Open Access I Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 MA, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

To create more efficient learning environments, the learner’s role and his/her influence on the learning process should be considered. The aim of this study was to determine the way self-controlled practice affected performance and learning of motor patterns. 60 female undergraduate students (mean age = 20.73 yr., SD = 2.98) were randomly assigned to four groups that ordered self-controlled practice or three yoked-to-self-controlled. In the acquisition phase, the self-controlled group was told they could choose whichever of three motor patterns they wanted before they practiced each trial. Each self-controlled participant’s practice schedule was served as the predetermined practice schedule for each corresponding participant in the yoked control groups. The yoked control participants practiced the tasks with high, low, or no (classic yoked-control) variability. The results showed that the self-controlled group performed the tasks faster than the other yoked control groups in both the acquisition phase and the retention tests. The findings suggest that if the learners are allowed to choose the sequence of practice in multiple motor skills, this would have facilitating effects on their performance and motor learning.

Keywords

1.   Andrieux, M., Boutin, A., & Thon, B. (2015). "Self-control of task difficulty during early practice promotes motor skill learning". Journal of Motor Behavior, 48(1), pp. 57-65.
2.   Brady, F. (2004). "Contextual interference: A meta-analytic study". Perceptual & Motor Skills, 99(1), pp. 116-126.
3.   Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). "Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning". Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), pp. 505-510.
4.   Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). "Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health". Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), pp. 182-185.
5.   Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). "Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning". Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), pp. 212-224.
6.   Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). "Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill". Perceptual & Motor Skills, 81(2), pp. 627-634.
7.   Keetch, K. M., & Lee, T. D. (2007). "The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulty". Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(5), pp. 476-486.
8.   Leotti, L. A., & Delgado, M. R. (2011). "The inherent reward of choice". Psychological Science, 22(10), pp. 1310–1318.
9.   Leotti, L. A., & Delgado, M. R. (2014). "The value of exercising control over monetary gains and losses". Psychological Science, 25(2), pp. 596-604.
10. Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (2013). "Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications" (10 ed.): McGraw-Hill New York.
11. Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). "A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition". Human Movement Science, 9(3), pp. 241-289.
12. Nezakatalhosseini, M., Movahedi, A., & Salehi, H. (1390). "The role of self –control feedback in learning through observation". Journal of Development & Motor Learning, 3(1), pp. 81-101 (In Persian).
13. Rahavi, R., Aslankhani, M., Abdoli, B., & Vahabzade, A. (1388). "The effects of scheduled practices (self-regulated and non-self-regulated) on learning of simple and complex tracking tasks". Journal of Development and Motor Learning, 1(2), pp. 65-86 (In Persian).
14. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). "Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), pp. 179-187.
15. Titzer, R., Shea, J. B., & Romack, J. (1993). "The effect of learner control on the acquisition and retention of a motor task". Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, pp. S84.
16. Wrisberg, C. A., & Pein, R. L. (2002). "Note on learners' control of the frequency of model presentation during skill acquisition". Perceptual & Motor Skills, 94(3), pp. 792-794.
17. Wu, W. F. W., & Magill, R. A. (2011). "Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns". Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), pp. 449-457.
18. Wulf, G., Raupach, M., & Pfeiffer, F. (2005). "Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning". Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(1), pp. 107-111.
19. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). "Attaining self-requlation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.