Fazlollah Bagherzadeh; Fatemeh Mirakhori; Morteza Pourazar
Abstract
Self-controlled feedback is a kind of augmented feedback which is represented by the request of learner. The aim of the present study was to compare self–control and instructor-control feedbacks after good and poor trials on acquisition and learning of a throwing task in children with cerebral ...
Read More
Self-controlled feedback is a kind of augmented feedback which is represented by the request of learner. The aim of the present study was to compare self–control and instructor-control feedbacks after good and poor trials on acquisition and learning of a throwing task in children with cerebral palsy. 60 children with cerebral palsy (age range: 7-12 years old) were selected by convenience sampling method from special schools in Tehran city. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: instructor-control feedback after good trials, instructor-control feedback after poor trials, and self-control feedback. At the end of the acquisition phase, participants of self–control group were divided into 2 groups (self–control feedback after good trials and self–control feedback after poor trails). One-way ANOVA test and Tukey post hoc test were used at (P<0.05). In the acquisition phase, no significant differences were observed among the groups (P=0.64). But self-control feedback group after good trials outperformed all groups in retention (P=0.001) and transfer (P=0.001) phases. In instructor-control condition, among those participants receiving feedback after good trials and in feedback received after poor trials condition, self-control subjects showed more progress. Thus, due to the low capacity of information processing in children, motivational role of feedback in self-control condition and after good trials leads to their better learning.
Morteza Pourazar; Rasool Hemayattalab; Elahe Arabameri
Abstract
Cerebral palsy is a term commonly used for conditions characterized by motor dysfunction due to non-progressive brain damage in early life. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of self-control and experimental-control feedback frequencies on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a throwing ...
Read More
Cerebral palsy is a term commonly used for conditions characterized by motor dysfunction due to non-progressive brain damage in early life. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of self-control and experimental-control feedback frequencies on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a throwing task in children with spastic cerebral palsy. From 1750 students with cerebral palsy in Tehran special schools, 30 children (7-12 years old) with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (SHCP) were selected by a convenience sampling method. A pretest consisting of 10 trials was performed to homogenize the participants. Participants were randomly divided into three self-control groups (with 25%, 50% and 75% feedback frequencies) and three experimental-control groups (with 25%, 50% and 75% feedback frequencies) in acquisition, retention, and transfer phases. In the acquisition phase, subjects completed 10 blocks of 8 trials (total of 80 trials). Retention and transfer phases were conducted 24 hours after the acquisition phase. These phases consisted of 10 trials without feedback, except that the subjects performed the transfer phase from 4m distance (vs. 3m distance in acquisition and retention phases). One-way ANOVA test showed no significant difference between the groups receiving the same frequencies (self-control and experimental-control groups) in the acquisition phase while self-control group outperformed in retention and transfer phases. Furthermore, participants who received higher feedback frequencies (self-control or experimental-control group) outperformed those in lower feedback frequencies in all acquisition, retention, and transfer phases. Thus, while the advantages of self-control feedback against experimental-control feedback were observed in the same feedback frequencies, it seems that children use feedbacks in a manner different from adults during motor learning. Thus children may require higher feedback frequencies than adults in order to optimize their motor learning.
Abolfazl Shayan; Davood Homeniyan; Hossein AbediniParizi; Jamal Fazel Kalkhoran
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the interactional effects of various video
shows (skilled and self-model) and feedback type on performance and learning of
dart throwing skill. 90 volunteers were randomly divided into 6 groups including
self-control, experimenter control and yoked feedback that ...
Read More
The aim of this study was to determine the interactional effects of various video
shows (skilled and self-model) and feedback type on performance and learning of
dart throwing skill. 90 volunteers were randomly divided into 6 groups including
self-control, experimenter control and yoked feedback that received either skilled
model or self-model. Three groups who watched the skilled model observed dart
throwing by a member of dart national team at first and at rest intervals whereas
self-model groups watched their own performance as a recorded movie. Selfcontrol
groups requested feedback from the examiner during their performance.
Yoked groups received feedback in those attempts on which self-control groups
requested feedback and experimenter-control groups received feedback by
examiner. Subjects trained for six days and then participated in the retention (after
48 hours) and transfer (immediately after retention) tests. The method of the study
was semi-experimental and data were analyzed using analysis of variance with
repeated measures, two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni and Tukey post
hoc tests. Results showed that all six groups improved from pretest to acquisition,
retention and transfer. Regardless of the role of feedback, there was no difference
between skilled and self-model in any stages. Experimenter control feedback had
more efficiency than other feedbacks in the acquisition while self-control feedback
was better in retention and transfer. Furthermore, results showed that those
subjects who received self-control feedback had more learning when they observed
self-model. The main reason why self-model-self-control feedback group was better
than other groups could be the effect of motivational processes resulted from this
interaction and more coordination of this feedback with subjects’ demands.
Amin Sadeghi; Mohamad.Kazem Vaez Mousavi; Masomeh Shojaee; Arezo Adeli far
Volume 1, Issue 3 , January 2009, , Pages 23-36
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of self-control, frequent and reduced feedback of KR on children's learning skill of throw targeting in Aleshtar city. For this purpose, 60 subjects were selected and assigned through step-by-step random method to three groups of self-control, frequent, ...
Read More
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of self-control, frequent and reduced feedback of KR on children's learning skill of throw targeting in Aleshtar city. For this purpose, 60 subjects were selected and assigned through step-by-step random method to three groups of self-control, frequent, and reduced. They performed the task of targeting through throwing in two steps of acquisition and retention with a delayed interval of 24 hours. The self-control group was divided into two groups of high (more than 30%) and low frequency (lower than 18%) after the acquisition phase. In both phases of acquisition and retention, inferential and descriptive statistics were used. In descriptive statistics, central indexes and dispersion of variables, in inferential statistics in acquisition phase, analysis of variance (series of practical efforts) 6 × 4 (how to present feedback) and in retention phase, one-variable analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test as well as SPSS 11.5 software were used (P?0.05). The results indicated no significant difference among these groups in acquisition phase. In retention phase, frequent group had better performance than other groups. The comparison between coach-oriented and subject-oriented practice methods shows that frequent coach- oriented practice method leads to better results for children.
