رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی

مجله علمی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

پیوندهای مفید

سیاست های دسترسی آزاد

سیاست کپی رایت

سیاست های مربوط به سرقت ادبی

سیاست های مربوط به آرشیو مقالات

سیاست های مربوط به محرمانه بودن

سیاستهای مالی

داوران

راهنمای عضویت و ثبت داوری در Publons

مقایسۀ اثر بازی‌های بومی محلی و حیاط پویا بر کارکرد شناختی، سواد بدنی و پیشرفت تحصیلی کودکان 8 تا 12 ساله

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license I Open Access I

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکدۀ علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلامشهر، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسۀ اثر بازی‌های بومی محلی و حیاط پویا بر کارکرد شناختی، سواد بدنی و پیشرفت تحصیلی کودکان 8 تا 12 ساله بود. آزمودنی‌ها 60 دانش‌آموز دبستانی پسر با میانگین و انحراف معیار سنی 43/2 ± 32/10 سال بودند. اجرای این پژوهش شامل چهار مرحلة پیش‌آزمون و تمرینات به دو شیوۀ بازی‌های بومی-محلی و حیاط پویا، پس‌آزمون و آزمون پیگیری بود. متغیرهای وابسته شامل کارکرد شناختی، سواد بدنی و پیشرفت تحصیلی بود که بهترتیب از ابزارهای تکلیف معکوس، سواد بدنی کانادا، پرسشنامۀ خودکارامدی تحصیلی برای ارزیابی آنها استفاده شد. بازی‌های بومی-محلی شامل آموزش براساس دوازده بازی بومی-محلی بود که بیشتر بر حرکت و تعامل بین فردی تکیه داشتند. علاوه‌بر این، گروه کنترل تمرینات حیاط پویا را که شامل برخی از حرکات از پیش تعیین‌شده بود، انجام دادند. پس از اطمینان از توزیع طبیعی داده‌ها، توسط آزمون شاپیرو-ویلک، از آمار توصیفی و روش‌های آماری آزمون تحلیل واریانس مرکب 3*2 و آزمون تعقیبی بنفرونی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد مقادیر کارکرد شناختی برای گروه تمرینات بازی‌های بومی محلی به نسبت گروه کنترل بیشتر بود (001/0; P=49/14F=). در ضمن سواد بدنی گروه بازی‌های بومی محلی افزایش بیشتری نسبت به گروه کنترل داشت (001/0; P=53/70F=). علاوه‌بر این، امتیازات پیشرفت تحصیلی برای گروه بازی‌های بومی محلی و کنترل در مرحلة پس‌آزمون به نسبت پیش‌آزمون افزایش یافته بود (01/0; P=44/34F=)، اما این افزایش در گروه بازی‌های بومی محلی بیشتر بود (03/0; P=17/2t=). نتایج پژوهش حاضر، بازی‌های بومی محلی را به‌عنوان مدلی بهتر در مقایسه با مدل حیاط پویا، برای بهبود کارکرد شناختی، سواد بدنی و پیشرفت تحصیلی کودکان، پیشنهاد می­کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of Local Indigenous Games on Cognitive Function, Physical Literacy and Academic Achievement Among Children 8 to 12 Years Old

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Hossein Manzari Tavakoli 1
  • Masoumeh Shojaei 2
  • Kivan Norouzi 3

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Motor Behavior, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran,

3 . Assistance Professor, Department of Physical education, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of local indigenous games on cognitive function, physical literacy, and academic achievement of children 8 to 12 years old. The participants were 60 male elementary school students with an average age of 10.32. The research was conducted in four phases, include Pre-test,, Training phase in local indigenous games and dynamic courtyard,, Posttest, and Follow-up. The local indigenous games training consisted of twelve traditional-indigenous games that relied highly on physical activity and interpersonal interactions skills. In addition, the control group performed dynamic courtyard training that included some predetermined activity in school. The descriptive statistics and statistical procedures of Mixed ANOVA 2*3 and Bonferroni post-hoc were utilized to analyze data. Results were indicated that the amount of cognitive function for the local indigenous games group was higher than the control group. In addition, the physical literacy of the local indigenous games group was increased more than the control group. Moreover, academic achievement points for the local indigenous games group and the control group in the pre-test to post-test were enhanced, but this increase was higher in the local indigenous games group. The results of this study, were suggested that local indigenous games as a better model compared to the dynamic courtyard model for improving cognitive function, physical literacy, and academic achievement among children 8 to 12 years old.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Children
  • Local indigenous games
  • Physical literacy
  • Cognitive function
  • Motor function
مراجع

  1. 1.Goodway JD, Ozmun JC, Gallahue DL. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019.

    1. Verstraete SJ, Cardon GM, De Clercq DL, De Bourdeaudhuij IM. Increasing children's physical activity levels during recess periods in elementary schools: the effects of providing game equipment. European journal of public health. 2006;16(4):415-9.
    2. Rahman M, Raja K, Rashid M, Kumar J. Listing of Indian Folk Games for Potential Therapeutic Benefits in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disability. Games for health journal. 2020;9(6):453-60.
    3. Gibson JJ. The theory of affordances. Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Eds Robert Shaw and John Bransford. 1977.
    4. Landa B. Methods of comprehensive evaluation of physical growth and physical preparation. Publ Savtsky Sport Moscow. 2005:134-41.
    5. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature reviews neuroscience. 2008;9(1):58-65.
    6. Khan NA, Hillman CH. The relation of childhood physical activity and aerobic fitness to brain function and cognition: a review. Pediatric exercise science. 2014;26(2):138-46.
    7. Gunnell KE, Longmuir PE, Barnes JD, Belanger K, Tremblay MS. Refining the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy based on theory and factor analyses. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(2):1-15.
    8. Cairney J, Dudley D, Kwan M, Bulten R, Kriellaars D. Physical literacy, physical activity and health: Toward an evidence-informed conceptual model. Sports Medicine. 83-371:(3)49,2019.
    9. Atkinson R, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Fredrickson B, Loftus G, Lutz C. Atkinson & Hilgard's introduction to psychology. Translator: Baraheni, Mn et al., Tehran: Roushd Print XXI; 1987.
    10. Gomes da Silva S, Arida RM. Physical activity and brain development. Expert review of neurotherapeutics. 2015;15(9):1041-51.
    11. Sturnieks DL, St George R, Lord SR. Balance disorders in the elderly. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008;38(6):467-78.
    12. Ratey JJ, Loehr JE. The positive impact of physical activity on cognition during adulthood: a review of underlying mechanisms, evidence and recommendations. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 2011;22(2):171-85.
    13. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British journal of sports medicine. 2020;54(24):1451-62.
    14. Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Carson V, Choquette L, Connor Gorber S, Dillman C, et al. Canadian physical activity guidelines for the early years (aged 0–4 years). Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2012;37(2):345-56.
    15. Gabbard CP. Lifelong motor development: Pearson Higher Ed; 2011.
    16. Hartman E, Houwen S, Visscher C. Motor skill performance and sports participation in deaf elementary school children. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 2011;28(2):132-45.
    17. Pramanik R. Play and indigenous games of children: A cultural heritage of western Odisha, India. Knowledge Cultures. 2018;6(02):96-110.
    18. Cooper SB, Dring KJ, Morris JG, Sunderland C, Bandelow S, Nevill ME. High intensity intermittent games-based activity and adolescents’ cognition: moderating effect of physical fitness. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1-14.
    19. Kiran A, Knights J. Traditional Indigenous games promoting physical activity and cultural connectedness in primary schools? Cluster Randomised Control Trial. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2010;21(2):149-51.
    20. Behzadi,E, Almond ,F, Nazakat Al-Husseini,M, Jafari, Gh. The Effect of Local Indigenous Games on Executive-Cognitive Functions in Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Sports Psychology, 2015; 7(1): 1049-1061. In Persian.
    21. Raney MA, Hendry CF, Yee SA. Physical activity and social behaviors of urban children in green playgrounds. American journal of preventive medicine. 9-522;(4)56,2019.
    22. Miller JL, Kocurek CA. Principles for educational game development for young children. Journal of Children and Media. 2017;11(3):314-29.
    23. Sugaya N, Shirasaka T, Takahashi K, Kanda H. Bio-psychosocial factors of children and adolescents with internet gaming disorder: a systematic review. BioPsychoSocial medicine. 2019;13(1):1-16.
    24. Rasberry CN, Lee SM, Robin L, Laris B, Russell LA, Coyle KK, et al. The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance: a systematic review of the literature. 2011;52:S10-S20.
    25. Sulistyaningtyas RE, Fauziah PY, editors. The Implementation of Traditional Games for Early Childhood Education. 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018) Atlantis Press; 2019.
    26. Kane MJ, Conway AR, Miura TK, Colflesh GJJJoEPL, Memory,, Cognition. Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. 2007;33(3):615.
    27. Ruiz-Contreras AE, Carrillo-Sánchez K, Gómez-López N, Vadillo-Ortega F, Hernández-Morales S, Carnevale-Cantoni A, et al. Working memory performance in young adults is associated to the AATn polymorphism of the CNR1 gene. Behavioural Brain Research. 2013;236:62-6.
    28. Longmuir PE, Gunnell KE, Barnes JD, Belanger K, Leduc G, Woodruff SJ, et al. Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy Second Edition: a streamlined assessment of the capacity for physical activity among children 8 to 12 years of age. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(2):1-12.
    29. Valadi S, Hamidi MJRoES. Studying the level of physical literacy of students aged 8 to 12 years. 2020;8(20):205-26.
    30. Mazaheri, Z., Sadeghi, A. Development and Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Students' Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. New Educational Approaches , 2016; 10(2): 61-80. In Persian.
    31. de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, Visscher C, Hartman E. Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2018;21(5):501-7.
    32. Sibley BA, Etnier JL. The relationship between physical activity and cognition in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatric exercise science. 2003;15(3):243-56.
    33. Hooke MC, Rodgers C, Taylor O, Koerner KM, Mitby P, Moore I, et al. Physical activity, the childhood cancer symptom cluster-leukemia, and cognitive function. Cancer Nursing. 2018;41(6):434-40.
    34. Simons J, Daly D, Theodorou F, Caron C, Simons J, Andoniadou E. Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 in 7–10-year-old Flemish children with intellectual disability. Adapted physical activity quarterly. 2008;25(1):71-82.
    35. Edwards LC, Bryant AS, Keegan RJ, Morgan K, Cooper S-M, Jones AM. ‘Measuring’physical literacy and related constructs: A systematic review of empirical findings. Sports Medicine. 2018;48(3):659-82.
    36. Blakemore S-J, den Ouden H, Choudhury S, Frith C. Adolescent development of the neural circuitry for thinking about intentions. 2007.
    37. Holmes J, Gathercole SE, Dunning DL. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental science. 2009;12(4):F9-F15.
    38. Lee DN. Tau in action in development. Action as an organizer of learning and development. 2005;33:1.
    39. Baranowski T. Games for increasing physical activity: Mechanisms for change. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 140 Huguenot Street, 3rd Floor New Rochelle, NY 10801 USA; 2015.
    40. Gathercole SE, Alloway TP, Willis C, Adams A-M. Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of experimental child psychology. 2006;93(3):265-81.
    41. Kleibeuker SW, De Dreu CK, Crone EA. The development of creative cognition across adolescence: distinct trajectories for insight and divergent thinking. Developmental science. 2013;16(1):2-12.
رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی
دوره 13، شماره 3
آذر 1400
صفحه 333-354
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 20 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 08 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 آبان 1400
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار