نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license I Open Access I

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی اثر خودگویی آموزشی و انگیزشی بر عملکرد پرتاب دارت با دشواری‌های متفاوت بود. تعداد 60 نفر از افراد مبتدی و راست دست با دامنه سنی 22 تا 28 سال به صورت دردسترس از دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد تبریز انتخاب و به صورت تصادفی به سه گروه خودگویی آموزشی، انگیزشی و کنترل تقسیم شدند. گروه‌های مورد مطالعه براساس دستورالعمل خود ۵ دسته ۱۲ کوششی را انجام دادند. تمام پرتاب‌ها در در سطح دشواری کم در فاصله 1/80 متری، در سطح دشواری متوسط از فاصله 2/37 متری و در سطح دشواری زیاد در فاصله 2/87 از تخته دارت انجام شدند. شاخص اندازه‌گیری عملکرد براساس میزان خطای شعاعی (فاصله محل برخورد دارت از مرکز) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. از روش آماری تحلیل واریانس ترکیبی 2 عاملی با اندازه‌گیری مکرر در عامل سطح دشواری برای آزمون فرضیه‌ها استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد خودگویی آموزشی و انگیزشی منجر به بهبود معنی‌دار عملکرد پرتاب دارت شد. همچنین، اثر دشواری معنی‌دار بود، و در نهایت، اثر تعاملی خودگویی و دشواری بر عملکرد پرتاب دارت معنی‌دار بود. درنهایت، به نظر می‌رسد در تکالیف ساده، به دلیل ماهیت مهارت، خودگویی آموزشی با تکیه بر نشانه های مرتبط به خوبی منجر به بهبود مهارت شده است، اما در سطح دشواری متوسط به نظر می‌رسد، نقش خودگویی انگیزشی پررنگ‌تر می‌شود زیرا شرایط نیازمند تلاش بیشتری برای موفقیت است، و این موضوع با رابطه بین دشواری تکلیف و عملکرد همخوانی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Motivational and Educational Self-Talk on the Dart Throwing Performance with Different Difficulties

نویسندگان [English]

  • Pouya Biabani 1
  • Amir Dana 2

1 Department of Physical Education, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Department of Physical Education, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of educational and motivational self-talk on dart throwing performance with different difficulties. A total of 60 beginners and right-handers with an age range of 22 to 28 years were randomly selected and randomly divided into three groups of educational self-talk, motivation and control. The study groups performed 5 groups of 12 attempts according to their instructions. All throws were performed at low difficulty level at a distance of 1.80 m, at medium difficulty level at a distance of 2.37 m and at high difficulty level at a distance of 2.87 m from the dartboard. The performance measurement index was evaluated based on the amount of radial error (distance of the dart from the center). The statistical method of two factor analysis of variance analysis was used with repeated measurements in the difficulty level factor for testing hypotheses. The results showed that educational and motivational self-talk led to significant improvement in the dart throw performance. Also, the effect of difficulty was significant, and finally, the interactive effect of self-talk and difficulty on the performance of the dart throwing was significant. In simple tasks, due to the nature of the skill, educational self-talk based on related cues seems to improve the skill well, but at a moderate difficulty level, the role of motivational self-talk seems to become more prominent because the situation requires more effort for success, and this is consistent with the relationship between task difficulty and performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Self talk
  • Students
  • Motor Tasks
  • Dart Throwing
  • Difficulty
  1. Sellars C. Building self-confidence. Coach Wise 1st4 1997.
  2. Hardy J. (2006). Speaking clearly: A critical review of the self-talk literature. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2006, 7(1), 81-97.
  3. Zinsser N., Bunker L., Williams J.M. Cognitive techniques for building confidence and enhancing performance. Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance, 2006, 5, 349-381.
  4. Theodorakis Y., Weinberg R., Natsis P., Douma I., Kazakas P. The effects of motivational versus instructional self-talk on improving motor performance. The sport psychologist, 2000, 14(3), 253-271.
  5. Hardy J., Oliver E., Tod D. A framework for the study and application of self-talk within sport. Advances in applied sport psychology: A review, 2009, 37-74.
  6. Shams A., Shamsipour Dehkordi P., Tahmasbi F., Sangari M. Effect of easy and difficult goals on self-efficacy and memory performance in young and elderly people: challenges for the cognitive effort hypothesis. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2020; 7 (3) :62-75. In Persian
  7. Jabbari, E., Charbaghi, Z., Dana, A. Investigating the Effects of Educational and Motivational Education at Different Levels on the Performance and Application of dart throwing. Journal of Humanities Insights, 2019; 03(02): 37-44.
  8. Dana A, Vaezmousavi M., Mokhtari P. The Effect of Instructional and Motivational Self Talk on Motor Performance in Adults and Adolescent. Advances in Environmental Biology, 2012, 6(3): 981-989.
  9. Thelwell R.C., Greenlees I.A., Weston N.J. The influence of game location and level of experience on psychological skill usage. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2009, 7(2), 203-211
  10. Van Raalte J.L., Vincent A., Brewer B.W. Self-talk: Review and sport-specific Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2016, 22, 139-148
  11. Harvey D.T., Van Raalte J.L., Brewer B.W. Relationship between self-talk and golf performance. International Sports Journal, 2002, 6(1), 84-91.
  12. Nedergaard J., Christensen M., Wallentin M. Valence, form, and content of self-talk predict sport type and level of performance, Consciousness and Cognition, 2021, 98: 1-17.
  13. Hase A., Hood J., Moore L. J., Freeman P. The influence of self-talk on challenge and threat states and performance, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2019, 45: 1-10.
  14. Guadagnoli M.A, Lee T.D. Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning, Journal of Motor Behavior, 2004, 36: 212-224,
  15. Hatzigeorgiadis A., Theodorakis Y., Zourbanos N. Self-talk in the swimming pool: The effects of self-talk on thought content and performance on water-polo tasks. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2004, 16(2), 138-150.
  16. Mallett C.J., Hanrahan S J. Race modeling: An effective cognitive strategy for the 100 m sprinter?. The Sport Psychologist, 1997, 11(1), 72-85.
  17. Landin D., Hebert E.P. The influence of self-talk on the performance of skilled female tennis players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 1999, 11(2), 263-282.
  18. Perkos S, Theodorakis Y, Chroni S. Enhancing performance and skill acquisition in novice basketball players with instruction self-talk. The sport Psychologist; 2002, (16):368-83.
  19. Dana A., Moradi J., Rafiee S. The Effect of the Frequency of Instructional and Motivational Self-Talk on performance of Dart throwing skill. Sport Psychology Studies, 2016; 5(17): 71-82. In Persian
  20. Hardy L., Jones J. G., Gould D. Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice of elite performers. John Wiley & Sons Inc. 1996.
  21. Georgakaki S. K., Karakasidou E. The Effects of Motivational Self-Talk on Competitive Anxiety and Self-Compassion: A Brief Training Program among Competitive Swimmers. Psychology, 2017, 8(05), 677.
  22. Hanshaw G. O., Sukal M. Effect of self-talk and imagery on the response time of trained martial artists. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2016, 5(3), 259.
  23. Movahedi, A., Bahram, A., Bordbar, S. The Effects of Different Methods of Self-Talk (Motivational, Instructional, and Combined) on Physical Efficacy, Acquisition and Learning of Dart Throw Task. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement, 2016; 8(1): 127-140.  In Persian
  24. Abdoli B., Farsi A., Riahi Farsani J. The Effect of Instructional and Motivational Self-talk on the Pattern of Coordination and Accuracy of Basketball free throw. JRSM. 2016; 5 (10) :1-13. In Persian
  25. Hardy J., Begley K., Blanchfield A. W. It's Good but it's Not Right: Instructional Self-Talk and Skilled Performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2015, 27(2), 132-139.
  26. Theodorakis Y., Hatzigeorgiadis A., Zourbanos N. Cognitions: Self-Talk and Performance. The Oxford Handbook of Sport and Performance Psychology, 2012, 191.
  27. Van Raalte J.L., Cornelius A.E., Brewer B.W., Hatten S.J. The antecedents and consequences of self-talk in competitive tennis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2000, 22(4), 345-356.