رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی

مجله علمی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

پیوندهای مفید

سیاست های دسترسی آزاد

سیاست کپی رایت

سیاست های مربوط به سرقت ادبی

سیاست های مربوط به آرشیو مقالات

سیاست های مربوط به محرمانه بودن

سیاستهای مالی

داوران

راهنمای عضویت و ثبت داوری در Publons

اثربخشی مدل بازی تاکتیکی بر خودکارامدی، لذت بردن از فعالیت بدنی و یادگیری سرویس بدمینتون

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license I Open Access I

نویسندگان

1 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران.

2 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران.

3 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف این پژوهش بررسی اثربخشی مدل بازی تاکتیکی بر خودکارامدی، لذت بردن از فعالیت بدنی و یادگیری سرویس بدمینتون بود.
روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع نیمه‌تجربی است و طرح پژوهش شامل پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون، در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل انجام گرفت. 30 شرکت‌کننده دانش‌آموز دختر 9 تا 12 ساله، به‌صورت داوطلبانه در تحقیق شرکت کردند و پس از همتاسازی بر اساس ویژگی‌های پیکرسنجی به شکل تصادفی در دو گروه مدل بازی تاکتیکی (15 نفر) و گروه تمرین سنتی (15 نفر) قرار گرفتند. برنامة تمرینی شامل یک دوره برنامة آموزش بدمینتون بود که طی هشت هفته و هر هفته سه جلسۀ یک‌ساعته به دو روش سنتی و بازی تاکتیکی انجام گرفت. ابزار مورد استفاده شامل پرسشنامۀ مقیاس لذت بردن از فعالیت بدنی، آزمون خودکارامدی عمومی و آزمون سرویس بلند بدمینتون بود.
یافته‌ها: نتایج تحلیل کوواریانس و آزمون تی مستقل نشان داد که گروه تمرینی مدل بازی تاکتیکی نسبت به گروه تمرین سنتی افزایش معناداری در خودکارامدی، لذت بردن از فعالیت بدنی و سرویس بلند بدمینتون داشتند.
نتیجه‌گیری: در کل، یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که تمرین با روش مدل بازی تاکتیکی نسبت به روش سنتی مزیت‌های روان‌شناختی دارد و باعث بهبود یادگیری مهارت حرکتی سرویس بلند بدمینتون می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effectiveness of the Tactical Games Model on Self-efficacy, Physical Activity Enjoyment, and Learning of Badminton Serve

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Jalilvand 1
  • Malek Ahmadi 2
  • Abdollah hemayattalab 3

1 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.

2 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran.

3 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the tactical games model on self-efficacy, physical activity enjoyment, and learning of badminton long serve in adolescent female students.
Methods: The current research method was a quasi-experimental type with a pre-test and post-test research design that included two experimental and control groups. Thirty female students aged 9 to 12 years old voluntarily participated in the research. After being homogeneous according to anthropometric features, they were randomly assigned to two tactical games model (n=15) and traditional training (n=15) groups. The training program included a badminton training program that was conducted for eight weeks and three 60-minute sessions per week using two traditional and tactical games methods. The tools used in this study included the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the badminton long serve test.
Results: The results of the analysis of covariance and independent samples t-test showed that the tactical games model group had a significant increase in self-efficacy, physical activity enjoyment, and badminton long serve scores compared with the traditional training group.
Conclusion: Overall, these findings suggest that a training course with a tactical games model has advantages in some psychological variables and motor skills learning of badminton long serve compared with the traditional method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • tactical game model
  • self-efficacy
  • enjoyment of physical activity
  • badminton
مراجع
Abdolshahi, M. (2018). Prediction of the Participation Motivation in Sport of Girls on the Basis of the Motivation of Physical Education Teachers, with the Self-Determination Theory Approach. Sport Psychology Studies (ie, mutaleat ravanshenasi varzeshi), 7(24), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.22089/spsyj.2018.1208 (In Persian)
Armstrong, N., & Welsman, J. R. (2006). The physical activity patterns of European youth with reference to methods of assessment. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 36(12), 1067–1086. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636120-00005
Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British journal of health psychology, 15(Pt 2), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709X461752
Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. Referenceshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
Behzadnia, B., Mohammadzadeh, H., & Ahmadi, M. (2019). Autonomy-supportive behaviors promote autonomous motivation, knowledge structures, motor skills learning and performance in physical education. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1692-1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9727-0
Blomqvist, M., Luhtanen, P., & Laakso, L. (2000). Expert‐novice differences in game performance and game understanding of youth badminton players. European Journal of Physical Education, 5(2), 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898000050207
Bruner, J. (1983). Play, thought, and language. Peabody Journal of Education, 60(3), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619568309538407
Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986). The curriculum model. Rethinking games teaching, 7-10.
Cataldo, R., John, J., Chandran, L., Pati, S., & Shroyer, A. L. (2013). Impact of physical activity intervention programs on self-efficacy in youths: a systematic review. ISRN obesity, 2013, 586497.https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/586497
Dania, A., & Harvey, S. (2020). Teaching basketball to sampling-year athletes: A game-centered and situated learning perspective. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(2), 529-538. https://doi.org/ 10.7752/jpes.2020.02079
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Demetriou, Y., & Höner, O. (2012). Physical activity interventions in the school setting: A systematic review. Psychology of sport and exercise, 13(2), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.11.006
Dudley, D., Okely, A., Pearson, P., & Cotton, W. (2011). A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical education and school sport interventions targeting physical activity, movement skills and enjoyment of physical activity. European Physical Education Review, 17(3), 353-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X11416734
Ford, P. R., Yates, I., & Williams, A. M. (2010). An analysis of practice activities and instructional behaviours used by youth soccer coaches during practice: Exploring the link between science and application. Journal of sports sciences, 28(5), 483-495. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02640410903582750
Gréhaigne, J. F., Caty, D., & Godbout, P. (2010). Modelling ball circulation in invasion team sports: a way to promote learning games through understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(3), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980903273139
Hadipoor, S., & Akbari, B. (2017). Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Play Therapy on self-efficacy and loneliness of Primary school students with learning difficulties. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies, 7, 64-64. https://doi.org/ 20.1001.1.23222840.1396.7.0.73.1
Harvey, S., Song, Y., Baek, J.-H., & Van Der Mars, H. (2016). Two sides of the same coin: Student physical activity levels during a game-centered soccer unit. European Physical Education Review, 22(4), 411-429. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1356336X15614783
Hatami, F., Tahmasbi, F., & Shayan, S. (2018). The Effects of Instructional and Motivational Self-Talk on Anxiety, Self-Confidence and Performance of Badminton Long Serve. Sport Psychology Studies (ie, mutaleat ravanshenasi varzeshi), 7(24), 17-34. https://doi.org/ 10.22089/spsyj.2018.4709.1503
Hodges, M., Wicke, J., & Flores-Marti, I. (2018). Tactical games model and its effects on student physical activity and gameplay performance in secondary physical education. Physical Educator, 75(1), 99-115.  https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2018-V75-I1-7551
Jalilvand M.,VaezMousavi, M. (2019). The Relationships among Social-contextual Environments, Motivation, Enjoyment and Satisfaction in Physical Education Class, Based on Self-dertemination Theory. Sport Psychology Studies (ie, mutaleat ravanshenasi varzeshi), 8(28), 13-26. https://doi.org/ 10.22089/spsyj.2017.3699.1375 (In Persian)
Kalaja, S., Jaakkola, T., & Liukkonen, J. (2010). Role of gender, enjoyment, perceived competence, and fundamental movement skills as correlates of the physical activity engagement of Finnish physical education students. Paper presented at the Scandinavian Sport Studies Forum, 1, 69-87
LaForge-MacKenzie, K., & Sullivan, P. J. (2014). The relationship between self-efficacy and performance within a continuous educational gymnastics routine. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(3), 206-217.https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2014.909511
Miller, A., Christensen, E., Eather, N., Gray, S., Sproule, J., Keay, J., & Lubans, D. (2016). Can physical education and physical activity outcomes be developed simultaneously using a game-centered approach? European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15594548
 Mitchell, S. A., & Walton-Fisette, J. L. (2022). The essentials of teaching physical education: Curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Human Kinetics.
Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J., & Griffin, L. L. (2020). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Human Kinetics Publishers.
Mohammadi, M., Soleimani Balavi, A., Jahani, J., Shafiei, M., & Daryanush, F. (2019). The Effect of Teaching Game for Understanding Approach (TGFU) on Learning High School Student Sports Skills in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching and Learning Studies, 11 (1), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.22099/jsli.2019.5342 (In Persian)
Mokaberian, M., Kashani, V., & Sedighi Faroji, F. (2018). Validation of the Persian version of Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale in Children. Motor Behavior, 9(30), 17-36. https://doi.org/ 10.22089/mbj.2018.3095.1382 (In Persian)
Moore, J. B., Yin, Z., Hanes, J., Duda, J., Gutin, B., & Barbeau, P. (2009). Measuring Enjoyment of Physical Activity in Children: Validation of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(1), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200802593612
Nathan, S. (2016). Badminton instructional in Malaysian schools: a comparative analysis of TGfU and SDT pedagogical models. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1215. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s40064-016-2872-3
Norouzi Seyed Hoseini, E., & Norouzi Seyed Hossieni, R. (2017). Effects of TGFU Teaching Method on Self-Determine Motivation and Learning of Volleyball Serve in Adolescent Students. Motor Behavior, 9(29), 183-198. https://doi.org/ 10.22089/mbj.2017.4342.1516 (In Persian)
Smith, L., Harvey, S., Savory, L., Fairclough, S., Kozub, S., & Kerr, C. (2015). Physical activity levels and motivational responses of boys and girls: A comparison of direct instruction and tactical games models of games teaching in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 21(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X14555293
Van de Kop, J. H., van Kernebeek, W. G., Otten, R. H. J., Toussaint, H. M., & Verhoeff, A. P. (2019). School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in Prevocational Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 65(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.02.022
Wallhead, T. L., & Buckworth, J. (2004). The role of physical educationin the promotionof youth physical activity. Quest, 56(3), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2004.10491827
Yaali, R., Teymoori, N., & Bagheri, S. (2020). The Effect of Training Method (Linear and Nonlinear) on Student Participation Motivation in Physical Education Class. Sport Psychology Studies (ie, mutaleat ravanshenasi varzeshi), 8(30), 205-220. https://doi.org/ 10.22089/spsyj.2019.7880.1850 (In Persian)
Yousefi, B., Asadzadeh, E., & azadi, R. (2017). The Relationship between Psychosocial and Environmental Factors Related to Physical Activity in Urmia girl high-schools. Applied Research in Sport Management, 6(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/ 20.1001.1.23455551.1396.6.2.4.8 (In Persian)
 
رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی
دوره 15، شماره 3
مهر 1402
صفحه 19-32
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 24 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 12 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 خرداد 1402
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار