مقایسه اثر شیوه های متفاوت تمرین ذهنی و بدنی بر عملکرد حرکتی دختران و پسران

عباسی بافقی, حمید; آیتی زاده تفتی, فرحناز; صادقیان شاهی, محمد رضا; وکیل زاده, محسن

doi:10.22059/jsmdl.2023.358984.1720

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license I Open Access I

نویسندگان

¹ گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی ، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

² گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

³ گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی ، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی ، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران .

⁴ گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه یزد ، یزد، ایران.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jsmdl.2023.358984.1720

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف از پژوهش حاضر مقایسۀ اثر شیوه‌های متفاوت تمرین ذهنی و بدنی بر عملکرد حرکتی دختران و پسران بود.
روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر به‌صورت نیمه‌تجربی است. نمونۀ آماری 80 نفر از دانش‌آموزان دختر و پسر شهرستان بشرویه با میانگین سنی 0/9±14 سال بودند که به تعداد برابر به‌صورت تصادفی به چهار گروه 20 نفری (تمرین بدنی، تصویرسازی سنتی، پتلپ و کنترل) تقسیم شدند. آزمودنی‌ها در پیش‌آزمون شرکت کرده و سپس به مدت شش هفته تمرین کردند. پس از تمرینات، در آزمون اکتساب شرکت کردند. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون تحلیل واریانس یکراهه، روش تحلیل واریانس دوراهه با اندازه‌گیری مکرر و آزمون تعقیبیLSD استفاده شد. سطح معنا‌داری 0/05 در نظر گرفته شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد بین دختران و پسران با توجه به شیوه‌های متفاوت تمرین، در عملکرد حرکتی تفاوت معنا‌داری وجود دارد. عملکرد هر دو جنس فقط در گروه‌های تمرین بدنی و پتلپ افزایش معنا‌داری پیدا کرد. همچنین میزان عملکرد در دختران و در پسران در گروه پتلپ نسبت به سایر گروه‌های تمرینی به‌طور معنا‌داری بهتر بود. علاوه‌بر این، پسران در گروه پتلپ نسبت به دختران عملکرد بهتری از خود نشان دادند.
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های پژوهش اهمیت و ضرورت توجه به شیوه‌های تمرین بدنی و پتلپ در بهبود عملکرد حرکتی دانش‌آموزان با توجه به جنسیت آنها را مطرح می‌کند. همچنین با قرار دادن تصویرسازی ذهنی پتلپ در برنامه‌ریزی تمرینی به‌خصوص پسران می‌توان افزایش عملکرد آنها را انتظار داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Compare the Effect of Different Mental and Physical Training Methods on the Motor Function of Girls and Boys

نویسندگان [English]

Hamid Abbasi Bafghi ¹
Farahnaz Ayatizadeh Tafti ²
mohamad Reza sadeghian shahi ³
Mohsen Vakilzadeh ⁴

¹ Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd , Iran

² Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

³ Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd , Iran.

⁴ Department of Sports Sciences , Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different mental and physical training methods on the motor function of girls and boys.
Methods: This study was quasi-experimental research. The statistical sample consisted of 80 male and female students of Boshruyeh City in equal numbers and with a mean age of 14±0.9 years old who were randomly assigned into four groups of 20 participants (Physical Training, Traditional Imagery, PETTLEP, and Control groups). The participants took part in the pre-test and then practiced for six weeks. After training, they participated in the acquisition test To analyze the data, one-way analysis of variance, two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and LSD post hoc tests were used. A significance level of 0.05 was considered.
Results: The results showed that there is a significant difference in motor function between boys and girls based on the different training methods. The motor function of both genders has improved significantly in the Physical Training and PETTLEP groups. Also, the level of motor function of girls and boys was significantly better in the PETTLEP group than in other groups. In addition, Boys in PETTLEP have better motor function than girls.
Conclusion: The findings of the study highlight the importance and necessity of paying attention to the methods of physical training and PETTLEP in improving the motor function of students according to their gender. An increase in the motor function of students can be expected especially for boys, by adding the PETTLEP in their training plan.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Mental training
Physical Training
Motor Performance

مراجع

Abedini, Y. (2016). The impact of mental imagery combined with physical exercise on learning and retention of psychomotor skills. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 7(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.22059/japr.2016.63542. (In Persian)

Afroozeh, M., & Afrooze, M. (2010). Comparing the Effects of Professional Method of PETTLEP-Based Imagery and Traditional Techniques of Imagery on Learning Badminton Short Service (Backhand). Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 2(3), -. Retrieved from. (InPersian)

Akurathi, S. (2020). Gender and age effects on mental imagery among high school students. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(4), 1031-1037. doi:10.25215/0804.121

Bahrami, A., Qutbi, A., & Khajawi, D. (2017). The effect of different visualization models on the balance of the elderly. Journal of sports management and movement behavior, 13(25), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.22080/JSMB.2017.1853. (In Persian)

Campos, A. (2014). Gender differences in imagery. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.010

Campos, A., & Lustres, A. (2019). Gender and age differences in spatial imagery and image rotation. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618807895

Chien, T.-H., Chen, J.-Y., Chen, S.-Y., & Chi, L.-K. (2022). Effects of different PETTLEP imagery training methods on high school basketball players’ jump-shot performance, self-confidence and anxiety. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(2), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.09.001

Cumming, J., & Williams, S. E. (2013). Introducing the revised applied model of deliberate imagery use for sport, dance, exercise, and rehabilitation. Movement & Sport Sciences-Science & Motricité(82), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2013098

Decety, J., , Sjo, H., Ryding, E., Stenberg, G., & Ingvar, D. H. (1990). The cerebellum participates in mental activity: tomographic measurements of regional cerebral blood flow. Brain research, 535(2), 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)91615-N

Dominikus, F., Fauzee, O., Abdullah, M., Chong, Meesin, C., & Choosakul, C. (2009). Relationship between mental skill and anxiety interpretation in secondary school hockey athletes. European Journal of Social Sciences, 9(4), 651-658.

Geiger, J. F., & Litwiller, R. M. (2005). Spatial working memory and gender differences in science. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(1), 49.

Ghafari, B., & Shahbazi, M. (2015). Comparing the ability of arousal control in male and female athletes using mental imagery and biofeedback methods. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 7(4), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.22059/jmlm.2015.57101. (In Persian)

Ghorbani, A., Ghotbi Varzaneh, A., & ParhizkarKohneOghaz, J. (2013). Comparing Effect of PETTLEP Imagery and Physical Practice on Acquisition and Reminding of Dart Throwing Skill. Motor Behavior, 13, 125-138. (In Persian)

Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational leadership, 62, 21-27.

Hemayat Talab, R., Movahedi, A. R., & Asad, M. R. (2008). Effect of Priority and Delay of Mental Practice on Perceptual –Motor Learning Emphasizing Internal and External Imagery. Journal of Investigation in Sport Sciences, 5(14), 139-151.)In Persian)

Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of applied sport psychology, 13(1), 60-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200109339004

Ismail, M. B. (2014). Practicein mind: Help to improve golf putting from the Hardest Distance.

Khanmohamadi, R., Khalaji, H., & Yousefi, R. (2016). The Effect of PETTLEP Imagery and Balance Practice on Dynamic Balance of the Elderly. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 8(1), 79-98. (In Persian)

Kizildag, E., & Tiryaki, M. Ş. (2012). Imagery use of athletes in individual and team sports that require open and closed skill. Perceptual and motor skills, 114(3), 748-756. https://doi.org/10.2466/05.20.22.pms.114.3.748-756.

Knackstedt, P. (2011). Optimal timing of a PETTLEP mental imagery intervention on a dart throwing task. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro,2011.

Lang, P. J. (1979). A bio‐informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology, 16(6), 495-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01511.x

Liu, K. P., Lai, M., Fong, S. S., & Bissett, M. (2019). Imagery ability and imagery perspective preference: a study of their relationship and age-and gender-related changes. Behavioural Neurology, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7536957

Mohammadi Jame, H; Zarei, P and Mohammadi Jame, F (2011). "Investigation of the effect of mental imagery on the balance performance of 10-15 year old students and comparison between boys and girls". The 6th National Conference of Physical Education and Sports Science Students of Iran, Azar 24-25, Tehran. (In Persian)

Morris, T., Spittle, M., & Watt, A. P. (2005). Imagery in sport Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Movahedi, A. R., Shiekh, M., Bagherzadeh, F., Ashayeri, H., & Hemayattalab, R. (2007). The Effect of Training in Two Motivational Environments on Performance and Learning Perceptual Motor Task. HARAKAT, 31(31), 149-165. (In Persian)

Naderi, M., Bahrami, A., & Khajavi, D. (2017). The effect of physical exercise and PETTLEP mental imagery (constant and variable) on learning basketball free throw task. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 9(1), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.22059/jmlm.2017.62001 (In Persian)

Palermo, L., Piccardi, L., Nori, R., Giusberti, F., & Guariglia, C. (2016). The impact of ageing and gender on visual mental imagery processes: A study of performance on tasks from the Complete Visual Mental Imagery Battery (CVMIB). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 38(7), 752-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1161735

Qaysari, S. F., Boroujani, S. T., & Kakavandi, M. A. (2018). Effectiveness of PETTLEP imagery in table tennis forehand learning of multiple sclerosis patients. Middle East J Disabil Stud, 4(8). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23222840.1398.9.0.60.2 (In Persian)

Quinton, M. L., Cumming, J., Gray, R., Geeson, J. R., Cooper, A., Crowley, H., & Williams, S. E. (2014). A PETTLEP imagery intervention with young athletes. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 9(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2014-0003

Rouzbahani, Z., Lotfi, G., & Tahmasebi, F. (2014). The Effects of Active and Passive Mental Imagery on Acquisition and Learning of Dart Throwing Skill. Strategic Studies on Youth ans Sports, 13(24), 43-60. (In Persian)

Sackett, R. S. (1934). The influence of symbolic rehearsal upon the retention of a maze habit. The Journal of General Psychology, 10(2), 376-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1934.9917742

Smith, D., Wright, C., Allsopp, A., & Westhead, H. (2007). It's all in the mind: PETTLEP-based imagery and sports performance. Journal of applied sport psychology, 19(1), 80-92. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10413200600944132

Smith, D., Wright, C. J., & Cantwell, C. (2008). Beating the bunker: The effect of PETTLEP imagery on golf bunker shot performance. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 79(3), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599502

Soflu, H. G., Esfahani, N., & Assadi, H. (2011). The Comparison of emotional intelligence and psychological skills and their relationship with experience among individual and Team athletes in superior league. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2394-2400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.466 (In Persian)

Sohrabi, M., Farsi, A., & Fouldian, J. (2009). Determining the validity and reliability of the revised visualization ability questionnaire. Research project, Institute of Physical Education, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (In Persian)

Tahmasebi, S., & Ghods Mirheydari, S. (2012). The Effect of Different Imagery Methods on Balance in Female Students of University of Tehran. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 4(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.22059/jmlm.2012.25078 (In Persian)

Thomas, J. R., & French, K. E. (1985). Gender differences across age in motor performance: A meta- analysis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.260

Vakil Zadeh, M., Ayati Zadeh, F., & Abbasi, H. (2019). Compare the Effect of Mental Practice Traditional, Pettlep and Physical on Basketball Free Throw Skill. Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 9(18), 166-177.http://doi.org/ 10.29252/JRSM.9.18.166 (In Persian)

Varlet, M., Bucci, C., Richardson, J, M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2015). Informational constraints on spontaneous visuomotor entrainment. Human movement science, 41, 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.humov.2015.03.011

Wakefield, C. J., & Smith, D. (2009). Impact of differing frequencies of PETTLEP imagery on netball shooting performance. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1043

Wakefield, C. J., Smith, D., Hogard, E., Ellis, R., & Parry, C. (2020). Using PETTLEP imagery as a simulation technique in nursing: Research and guidelines. Nurse Education in Practice, 43, 102700. https://doi/org/ 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102700

Wright, C. J., & Smith, D. (2009). The effect of PETTLEP imagery on strength performance. International journal of sport and exercise psychology, 7(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1612197X.2009.9671890

Wright, C. J., & Smith, D. K. (2007). The effect of a short-term PETTLEP imagery intervention on a cognitive task. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1014